2 2:1For you yourselves know, brothers, that our coming to you was not in vain. 2 2:2But though we had already suffered and been shamefully treated at Philippi, as you know, we had boldness in our God to declare to you the gospel of God in the midst of much conflict. 3 2:3For our appeal does not spring from error or impurity or any attempt to deceive, 4 2:4but just as we have been approved by God to be entrusted with the gospel, so we speak, not to please man, but to please God who tests our hearts. 5 2:5For we never came with words of flattery, as you know, nor with a pretext for greed—God is witness. 6 2:6Nor did we seek glory from people, whether from you or from others, though we could have made demands as apostles of Christ. 7 2:7But we were gentle among you, like a nursing mother taking care of her own children. 8 2:8So, being affectionately desirous of you, we were ready to share with you not only the gospel of God but also our own selves, because you had become very dear to us.
9 2:9For you remember, brothers, our labor and toil: we worked night and day, that we might not be a burden to any of you, while we proclaimed to you the gospel of God. 10 2:10You are witnesses, and God also, how holy and righteous and blameless was our conduct toward you believers. 11 2:11For you know how, like a father with his children, 12 2:12we exhorted each one of you and encouraged you and charged you to walk in a manner worthy of God, who calls you into his own kingdom and glory.
Section Overview
First-century Roman cities were full of traveling philosophers, magicians, and religious enthusiasts who gained their livelihood from public teaching. Ancient literature often associates such teachers with greed and immorality. They amassed wealth and notoriety through their fine-sounding rhetoric. Some happily argued both sides of a debate, indifferent to the truth of the matter. Their teaching could shift according to audience desires. Often they behaved reprehensibly toward others—mocking their opponents, winning over the weak-willed, engaging in sexual relations with followers, and sponging off of the rich.
In this section, Paul persuasively distinguishes his ministry from such people. Paul and his colleagues approached the Thessalonians with love and affection, seeking to please God with their conduct and message. Paul reminds the church of the suffering he and his team were willing to undergo for the sake of the gospel as evidence that they were motivated by God’s commissioning them to this task, which they carried out with honest concern for the welfare of the Thessalonians. Both God and the Thessalonians serve as witnesses to how Paul and his team proclaimed the good news boldly without guile, error, or falsehood. Concerning their relationship with the churches, Paul draws analogies both to the affection of motherhood and to the loving instruction of fathers to their children. Paul’s goal was to gather those called by God to be his kingdom people and to encourage them to walk in ways worthy of God.
Many have postulated a tone of defensiveness in Paul’s words. Some see this passage as key to the whole epistle, since they believe Paul structured the letter as a rhetorical apology for (or defense of) his conduct while in Thessalonica and for why he had not yet returned to visit the church. Some surmise that, after he left, Paul’s reputation was being sullied and Paul feared the church would cave in to such attacks. It is certainly the case that, within a few years, Paul would make just such a defense to believers in Corinth (cf. esp. 2 Cor. 10:1–13:10), so it is conceivable that Paul might have needed to do the same here. However, no overt mention of any such attacks on Paul’s reputation is found in 1 or 2 Thessalonians, and this paragraph appears too early and too isolated in the epistle for us to conceive of the entire letter as a kind of rhetorical apology.
It is clear that Paul reminds his audience of his ministry among them for other purposes, especially in order to highlight the truth of the gospel by showing that the gospel messengers brought this good news amid suffering, without false motives but rather with a desire to please God and with a love for the Thessalonians.
Response
At some level, all Christians engage in ministry as Spirit-gifted members of the Christian community, encouraging others and witnessing to the world. Thus we all can identify with Paul’s approach to missional service as a model to be followed. The character of gospel witness is important to Paul, since young believers will be better established in the good news if they have appropriate respect for those who brought it to them. Additionally, Paul often invites the churches to imitate him as he imitates Christ, so that others will live in holy and blameless conduct in response to the gospel.
In Christian ministry, the messenger ought to embody and present the gospel message in a worthy manner. Paul illustrates the importance of this, contrasting it with how others in his day might have abused their audiences. Sadly, in today’s church there are those who promulgate erroneous notions of God, encourage false ethics, or seek to add to their personal wealth by expanding their audience. In contrast, we do well to conduct our ministry before God, endeavoring at all times to testify to the gospel with holy, righteous, and blameless conduct.
Paul also models a ministry of boldness. Even amid adversity to the gospel, whether in physical suffering or in shame, Paul does not hesitate to stay true to his Lord. This too should be the calling for all who seek to please God, heedless of human approval or disapproval.
Yet Paul’s gospel boldness overflows with a compassionate affection for those in his charge. Like a mother, he yearns for the church, loving and caring for them all. Like a father, he lovingly instructs them in the truths of gospel life. It is certainly possible for us, amid the pressures and frustrations of life, to lose sight of how important it is for our love for the people in our ministries to be apparent in how we serve them.
The opening “for” connects this recollection to the preceding thanksgiving section, indicating that Paul intends to elaborate on his previous reasons for confidence in the salvation of the Thessalonians. His work among them has not come up empty. Yet now the focus shifts more to the integrity of Paul and his colleagues in their gospel mission.
As before (1:4), Paul mentions his affectionate ties with the church, evident here in his use of “brothers” to describe his relationship to all in the church. Such family language will continue as Paul soon employs both maternal (2:7–8) and paternal (vv. 11–12) imagery.
Paul’s reference in 1 Thessalonians to these events focuses on two aspects of his team’s reception while in Philippi: their suffering and their shameful treatment. The Greek term for “shamefully treated” appears elsewhere in the NT for physical injury used as a means of mockery and shame (Matt. 22:6; Luke 18:32; Acts 14:5). As Acts makes clear (16:37), Roman law did not permit the public beating of Roman citizens in such circumstances, and such treatment was deemed dishonorable. Thus Paul and Silas received shameful disrespect as well as physical injury.
In this verse, Paul contrasts these sufferings with their continued boldness in declaring the gospel just a short time later in Thessalonica. This boldness was not self-generated but arose from their relationship to God as bearers of the gospel. Certainly this highlights the respect to be accorded these missionaries and their message. Moreover, it serves as a point of contact between Paul and the Thessalonians, since that church was also undergoing suffering and persecution (1 Thess. 1:6; 2:14). Therefore, Paul and his colleagues serve again as a model of gospel perseverance for the Thessalonians to imitate (1:6).
The Thessalonians already “know” (2:2) of the suffering Paul and his colleagues endured in Philippi. Paul had likely talked about this with the Thessalonian believers while they were together. In fact, Paul and his colleagues continued to “declare to you the gospel of God in the midst of much conflict” (v. 2), alluding to how persecution followed them to Thessalonica and beyond. The Greek word here for “conflict” (agōn) is often used as an athletic metaphor (cf. 2 Tim. 4:7; Heb. 12:1) connoting struggle against opposition in order to achieve victory. Paul expresses that he had been emboldened to declare the “gospel of God” (also 1 Thess. 2:8–9; Rom. 15:16; 1 Tim. 1:11), a phrase used interchangeably with his more typical “gospel of Christ” (cf. 1 Thess. 3:2).
Already in verse 2, Paul’s willingness to declare the gospel amid much persecution has served as evidence of his good character. In verse 3, Paul notes that his team came with an “appeal” (Gk. paraklēsis) that did not originate in “error” (Gk. planē, meaning a wandering from the truth; cf. James 5:20; 2 Pet. 3:17; 1 John 4:6). Their exhortation also did not derive from impure or unclean motives originating from moral corruption (Gk. akatharsia). Finally, Paul and his colleagues did not approach the Thessalonians in guile, with the goal of “deception” (Gk. dolos).
Verse 4 remarks that Paul and his team did not come to please their listeners with a message full of deception and error. Rather, their message came at the pleasure of God. Indeed, Paul’s team had been “tested” (Gk. dokimazō). God, who can penetrate the motives of human hearts, has verified that these workmen are worthy to be entrusted with the good news of the gospel (cf. Gal. 2:7; 1 Tim. 1:11; Titus 1:3). They are faithful messengers from God himself, and thus they approach their ministry with good motives.
Paul contrasts his team’s approach with that of itinerant philosophers and teachers, who could employ flattery to deceive their listeners so that they might greedily receive gain and glory from their work (cf. Rom. 16:18; Phil. 3:19; 2 Pet. 2:3). Paul and his colleagues did not utter “words of flattery,” nor did their motives stem from “greed.” They did not seek “glory” from human sources. Any gain and glory they received from their ministry could come only from God.
Paul admits that he had a right to receive compensation from his ministry, since he was acting as an apostle of Christ. While writing to the Corinthians, Paul notes that he had the right to receive financial return from those to whom he was ministering, but he refused to burden the church with his financial needs (1 Cor. 9:12, 15; 2 Cor. 11:9; 12:13). Paul insists that ministers of the gospel rightly deserve compensation for their gospel service (1 Cor. 9:8–14; 1 Tim. 5:17–18; cf. Luke 10:7–8). However, Paul gave up these ministerial (and apostolic) rights for the sake of the gospel and for the benefit of the churches. In Corinth and likely in Thessalonica (cf. 2 Thess. 3:7–9; also 1 Thess. 2:9), Paul worked in his trade as a tentmaker (Acts 18:3) and received support from other churches (2 Cor. 11:8–9; Phil. 4:14–16) so that he would not need funds from the church with whom he was staying.
Through diligent labor, Paul established a strong work ethic among the churches that he will later encourage the Thessalonians to imitate (2 Thess. 3:6–12). This was also undoubtedly a good missionary strategy, as it set Paul and his colleagues apart from the many itinerant preachers who sought ill-gotten gain with false philosophy. In contrast, Paul’s team proved themselves to be motivated by God himself, by the truth of their proclamation, and by their love for the Thessalonians.
Sometimes people conceive of Paul as the fervent apostle, on the forefront of the gospel battlefield, spreading his message and moving frequently from city to city, yet relatively unconnected to local congregations. Paul was certainly a fervent apostle with a profound message, yet these verses display his love for those to whom he ministered. His mission was deeply rooted in affection for the church. Paul and his colleagues put that love on display for all the church to see. He is not reticent about his fondness for others, and he gladly announces his love for them, in part to motivate their continued faithfulness to the Lord Jesus. Certainly this serves as a wonderful model for all of Christ’s ministers.
Verse 7 employs maternal imagery to portray Paul and his colleagues as deeply caring for the welfare of the Thessalonian church. Paul speaks of a nurse whose expertise in looking after other people’s children now overflows in affection and care for her own children.
The relationship between verses 7 and 8 is more continuous than the English punctuation might imply. There is a connection between “like” (Gk. hōs) in verse 7 and “so” (Gk. houtōs) in verse 8 (cf. Rom. 5:18; 2 Cor. 7:14). Therefore, one should read, “Like a nursing mother taking care of her own children, . . . so . . . we were ready to share with you . . . our own selves.”
Paul and his colleagues declare that they approached the Thessalonians in order to share of themselves as well as sharing the good news about Jesus. In all of this they were motivated by their “affectionate desire” because these young believers had become dear to these missionaries. The degree of personal commitment from Paul and his missionary friends to the Thessalonian believers is quite remarkable.
On many occasions Paul employs the metaphor of walking (Gk. peripateō) to depict the Christian life (esp. Eph. 4:1; Col. 1:10; 1 Thess. 4:1, 12; also, e.g., Rom. 8:4; 14:15; Gal. 5:16). This conveys an ongoing effort to pursue a certain path with endurance. The metaphor occurs frequently in the OT (e.g., Pss. 1:1; 119:1; Prov. 2:20) and can even be found in pagan Roman thought. Paul’s specific exhortation here is for the Christian to proceed through life in a manner that God would endorse.
God sets the worthy standard of Christian living, and he empowers Christians from the beginning through “calling” them (cf. Rom. 8:30; 1 Thess. 4:7; 5:24; 2 Thess. 2:14) in election to participate in his own “kingdom and glory.” “Glory” refers to the marvelous weightiness and wonder of God’s presence and being. Christians are privileged to participate in this glory of God (Rom. 8:21; 1 Cor. 2:7). Paul elsewhere follows Jesus’ regular idiom concerning the kingdom of God (Rom. 14:17; 1 Cor. 4:20; Col. 4:11; 2 Tim. 4:1), especially focusing on the coming eternal rule of God in Christ (1 Cor. 6:9–10; 15:24, 50), which is the inheritance of Christ’s followers (2 Thess. 1:5).
In sum, Paul reminds the Thessalonians of God’s electing call that leads them into his kingdom and glory. Such a calling imposes a proper response that involves following God’s ways. Paul, like a father exhorting his children, encourages the church to live accordingly.
1 As the ESV margin indicates, in many early Greek manuscripts the word “infants” appears instead of “gentle”—the Greek variation consists of a single letter (
nēpioi vs.
ēpioi). The difference in meaning would be slight, since using “infants” (
nēpioi) would convey that their motives were pure and without greed, consistent with verse
5.