30 

Peter’s Denial: A Warning about Self-Confidence
(Mark 14:66–72) 

As Peter was below in the courtyard, one of the servant-girls of the high priest came, and seeing Peter warming himself, she looked at him and said, “You also were with Jesus the Nazarene.” But he denied it, saying, “I neither know nor understand what you are talking about.” And he went out onto the porch. The servant-girl saw him, and began once more to say to the bystanders, “This is one of them!” But again he denied it. And after a little while the bystanders were again saying to Peter, “Surely you are one of them, for you are a Galilean too.” But he began to curse and swear, “I do not know this man you are talking about!” Immediately a rooster crowed a second time. And Peter remembered how Jesus had made the remark to him, “Before a rooster crows twice, you will deny Me three times.” And he began to weep. (14:66–72)

Although they are new creatures in Christ (2 Cor. 5:17), believers understand that their flesh (body and mind) is still fallen (Rom. 7:18; Gal. 5:17–21). They have experienced the redemption of their souls, but not yet their bodies (Rom. 8:23). Thus, the old self and its remaining corruption must be continually put to death (Rom. 8:13; Col. 3:5–10). Though the regenerated spirit desires to pursue righteousness, the flesh is prone to weakness and sin (cf. Mark 14:38). As the apostle Paul expressed, “Wretched man that I am! Who will set me free from the body of this death?” (Rom. 7:24).

The Bible teaches that all men and women, as members of the fallen human race, are weak, sinful, and corrupt (cf. Rom. 3:23). At conversion, believers are regenerated through the power of the Holy Spirit (Titus 3:3–7; cf. John 3:3–8), so that their desires, aspirations, and longings change to reflect the new creation (2 Cor. 5:17). Yet, they still have to fight against the fallenness of remaining sin, arming themselves for the incessant spiritual battle (Eph. 6:12–17; cf. Rom. 13:12; 2 Cor. 10:3–4).

Failure to recognize the enemy within places believers in danger. Paul explained that precarious reality to the Corinthians, “Therefore let him who thinks he stands take heed that he does not fall” (1 Cor. 10:12). Like vigilant soldiers, Christians must be on constant guard, not only against Satan and the world but also against the resident lusts of the flesh (cf. 1 John 2:15–17). Those who become prideful and overconfident make themselves easy targets for the enemy (cf. 1 Peter 5:5–8). In this passage (Mark 14:66–72), Peter serves as an example of one who fell when he presumptuously thought he could stand.

The gospel records portray Peter as a genuine believer who deeply loved the Lord Jesus. After leaving everything behind (Mark 10:28), he followed the Savior, heeded His preaching, witnessed His miracles, and embraced Him in saving faith. It was Peter who said, “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have words of eternal life. We have believed and have come to know that You are the Holy One of God” (John 6:68–69). Later, he exuberantly declared to Jesus, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God” (Matt. 16:16). In the upper room, when Jesus told Peter that if He did not wash his feet, he had no part in Him, Peter quickly replied, “Lord, then wash not only my feet, but also my hands and my head” (John 13:9). Among the disciples, no one was more vocal about loving Christ than Peter (cf. Mark 14:29).

Yet, on the same night that Judas betrayed Jesus, Peter denied Him. It was a repeated denial that kept occurring over a two-hour period of time—likely from about 1:00 A.M. to 3:00 A.M. While Jesus stood trial before both Annas and Caiaphas, Peter lingered outside in the courtyard where he insisted that he had never even met Jesus. The Lord stayed silent before His accusers, opening His mouth only to speak the truth even though He knew it would cost Him His life (14:62). What a contrast to Peter, who fearfully kept speaking lies to protect himself.

On the one hand, the story of Peter’s failure serves as a sobering reminder of the weakness of the flesh and the grievous consequences of sin in spite of the best intentions. On the other hand, it is also an encouragement to believers regarding the forgiveness of God. Though Peter’s iniquity was grievous and blatant, it did not take him beyond the reaches of divine mercy, grace, and restoration. The account of Peter’s denials highlights his foolish confidence, his failing cowardice, and his fervent contrition.

FOOLISH CONFIDENCE

The seeds of Peter’s failure were sown hours before he entered the courtyard of the high priest and began to deny his Lord. While in the upper room and then in the garden, Peter exhibited signs of overconfidence and pride that further set him up for a fall (cf. Prov. 16:18). He boasted too much, listened too poorly, prayed too little, acted too fast, and followed too far.

Peter boasted too much. As Jesus and the disciples ate the Passover meal, the Lord said to Peter, “Simon, Simon, behold, Satan has demanded permission to sift you like wheat; but I have prayed for you, that your faith may not fail; and you, when once you have turned again, strengthen your brothers” (Luke 22:31–32). Peter responded to that somber admonition not with honest, self-doubting humility and prayerful introspection but by boasting about his courage: “Lord, with You I am ready to go both to prison and death!” (v. 33). On the way to the garden of Gethsemane, when Jesus repeated a similar warning, Peter again replied with smug confidence, ““Even though all may fall away, yet I will not” (Mark 14:29); and once more, “Even if I have to die with You, I will not deny You!” (14:31). Clouded by his own self-reliance, Peter thought he was spiritually invincible and incapable of disloyalty to Christ.

Peter listened too poorly. Peter’s pride not only blinded his mind but also deafened his ears. Instead of truly hearing Jesus, he ignored the Lord’s repeated warnings. Peter understood that Jesus was the Son of God (Matt. 16:16), and that He knew all things (cf. John 21:17), yet he refused to heed His words on this occasion. When Jesus told the eleven, “You will all fall away” (Mark 14:27), and then said to Peter individually, “Truly I say to you, that this very night, before a rooster crows twice, you yourself will deny Me three times” (14:30), the stubborn disciple closed his ears and even began to argue with Jesus, blatantly contradicting what the Lord Himself had just said (14:31).

Peter prayed too little. When Jesus and the disciples arrived at the garden, the Lord specifically instructed them, “Pray that you may not enter into temptation” (Luke 22:40; cf. Matt. 6:13). This was the time for Peter and the other apostles to arm themselves for the traumatic events that were about to take place. But, when he should have been calling out for heaven’s help, Peter was napping. As Mark records,

Peter lost the personal struggle in the dark garden when, instead of drawing on divine power, he confidently slept. Consequently, when temptation arose in the heat of the battle, he was woefully unprepared.

Peter acted too fast. The slumbering disciples awoke to the sound of soldiers approaching, and watched in horror as one they thought a true disciple betrayed Jesus with a kiss! In a moment of overzealous courage, Peter impetuously drew his sword against the surrounding multitude (Mark 14:47; cf. John 18:10). Still operating in the strength of his flesh, and wanting to prove his earlier professions of loyalty to Christ, he did not wait for instructions from Jesus. Instead, he attacked, managing to cut off the ear of the high priest’s servant. On one level, Peter’s attempt to defend Jesus with a sword may seem noble. But, as Jesus explained to him in Matthew 26:52–54, Peter’s impulsive actions in that moment were reckless (v. 52), unnecessary (v. 53), and actually ran contrary to the Word of God, which foretold that the Messiah must suffer (v. 54). And such an act could result in Peter’s death sentence (vv. 51–52). Sadly, rash behavior would continue to characterize Peter over the subsequent hours.

Peter followed too far. Luke 22:54 explains that as the soldiers led Jesus back to the house of the high priest, “Peter was following at a distance.” Peter found himself caught between faith and fear, loyalty and terror, courage and cowardice. He was curious to see what would happen to Jesus; yet not brave enough to stand with Him. Thus, he entered the high priest’s residence to watch the trial but hoped to blend in so that no one would notice who he was. His desire to remain incognito would lead to his undoing. Remaining at a distance, Peter exposed himself to a spiritually precarious situation for which he was wholly unprepared.

FAILING COWARDICE

As Peter was below in the courtyard, one of the servant-girls of the high priest came, and seeing Peter warming himself, she looked at him and said, “You also were with Jesus the Nazarene.” But he denied it, saying, “I neither know nor understand what you are talking about.” And he went out onto the porch. The servant-girl saw him, and began once more to say to the bystanders, “This is one of them!” But again he denied it. And after a little while the bystanders were again saying to Peter, “Surely you are one of them, for you are a Galilean too.” But he began to curse and swear, “I do not know this man you are talking about!” Immediately a rooster crowed a second time. (14:66–72a)

As Zechariah 13:7 predicted they would, the eleven disciples responded to Jesus’ arrest by scattering into the night (Mark 14:50). The Lord was taken first to the house of Annas, a former high priest and the patriarch of the priestly family (John 18:13–24). Though he had been removed from office around A.D. 15, Annas was replaced by several of his sons in succession. His son-in-law Caiaphas (who served as high priest from A.D. 18–36) held the position at the time of Jesus’ arrest, allowing Annas to wield ongoing influence as high priest emeritus. The high priesthood was originally designed as a lifetime position (cf. Num. 35:28), but by the time of the New Testament, there were constant changes. From Herod the Great to the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70, there were nearly thirty men in that office, reflecting its corruption and control by the Romans.

The gospel accounts imply that Annas and Caiaphas both lived at the same large estate. In first-century Israel, multiple generations of a family often lived together, and the high priestly mansion was large enough to accommodate Annas and members of his extended family, including Caiaphas. Large homes in ancient Israel were laid out like great, multistoried rectangles surrounding a sizable inner courtyard. Within the mansion, Annas and Caiaphas would have had separate living areas, or “houses,” while sharing the same inner courtyard. Hence, the courtyard of Caiaphas (Matt. 26:57–58) and the courtyard of Annas (John 18:15–16) refer to the same location. To go from the residence of Annas to that of Caiaphas, Jesus traversed the common courtyard between the different wings of the estate (cf. John 18: 24). It was here, at the house of the high priest, that all of Peter’s denials occurred.

Peter’s failings in those nighttime hours are recorded in all four gospels, a comparison of which reveals that they occurred in three separate episodes, with each incident involving multiple rapid-fire accusations from bystanders and repeated renunciations from the cowardly apostle. The fact that the gospel writers highlight different aspects of Peter’s denials in no way calls their historical reliability into question. Rather, the details from each account harmonize perfectly to paint a single, harrowing picture of Peter’s experience on that dramatic night. (For a harmony of the denials of Peter, see John MacArthur, One Perfect Life [Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2012], sections 182, 184.)

The house of the high priest, surrounded by a wall, would have been entered from the street via a gate, which opened to a corridor leading into the inner courtyard. Because Peter was unknown to the high priest’s family, he would not have been allowed to enter if it had not been for another “disciple, who was known to the high priest, [who] went out and spoke to the doorkeeper, and brought Peter in” (John 18:16; cf. v. 15). Traditionally, the other disciple has been identified as John, the beloved disciple (John 13:23–24) who authored the fourth gospel. The New Testament gives no indication what happened to John that night, after he helped Peter gain entry. The focus of the narrative remains on Peter, who having come through the gate, was below in the courtyard.

At first, Peter was covertly warming himself by the fire, trying to blend in with officers of the temple guard and members of the household staff, when he was suddenly recognized. One of the servant-girls of the high priest, the same household slave who had opened the gate for Peter (cf. John 18:15–17), came, and seeing Peter warming himself, she looked at him intently (Luke 22:56). That whole week, Jesus and His disciples had frequented the temple. Perhaps it was there that this servant girl had seen Peter. Or her suspicions may have been aroused when she initially opened the gate so that Peter could come in (cf. John 18:17). Recognizing him as a disciple of Jesus, she said, “You also were with Jesus the Nazarene.” Because her words are slightly varied in the various gospel accounts, it is likely that she stated her same basic accusation several times, repeating it loudly enough that the entire group huddled around the fire heard her (cf. Matt. 26:70).

The girl’s accusations came as a shock to Peter, whose immediate response exposed his vulnerability. Caught completely by surprise, Peter panicked and denied it, saying “I neither know nor understand what you are talking about.” The other gospel writers note that Peter also said, “Woman, I do not know Him” (Luke 22:57); and when accused of being Jesus’ disciple, he added, “I am not” (John 18:17). In a moment of weakness, the overconfident apostle was laid low by the simple questions of a lowly servant girl. Embarrassed and eager to escape, Peter left the fire and went out onto the porch, the corridor that led back to the street. There, in the entryway, he hoped to regain his composure and maintain his anonymity.

At this point in the narrative, some English translations (such as the New King James Version) add the phrase, “and a rooster crowed.” However, that addition was likely not part of Mark’s original gospel, since it is not found in the earliest manuscripts. It was probably inserted by a later scribe trying to account for Mark’s subsequent comment that a rooster crowed a second time (v. 72). If a rooster did crow at this time, Peter was apparently unaware of it, since it seemingly had no effect on his actions.

Peter’s escape to the entryway was short-lived. A little while later (Luke 22:58), he was again recognized as he stood in the corridor. The servant-girl saw him, and began once more to say to the bystanders, “This is one of them!” This time, she was joined in her allegations by at least two other servants, one female (Matt. 26:71) and another male (Luke 22:58). Assaulted by the chorus of accusations, and feeling the gaze of additional bystanders, again he denied it. Unlike Peter’s first repudiation, this act of cowardice was premeditated, since he was not caught off guard as he had been earlier. Rather than acknowledging the truth, Peter became even more intense, adamantly disavowing any association with Jesus “with an oath” and saying, “I do not know the man” (Matt. 26:72).

In spite of the allegations and questions being directed his way, Peter decided to stay at the house of the high priest, probably curious to find out what would happen to Jesus. After a little while had passed (Luke 22:59 reports that it was about an hour later), he was confronted a third time by a group of bystanders who were again saying to Peter, “Surely you are one of them, for you are a Galilean too.” Peter’s Galilean accent had given him away (Matt. 26:73). Moreover, a man in the group recognized him from the garden of Gethsemane. As John reports, “One of the slaves of the high priest, being a relative of the one whose ear Peter cut off, said, ‘Did I not see you in the garden with Him?’” (John 18:26). Once again, the reluctant disciple found himself hemmed in on all sides.

Peter’s final disavowal of Christ was the most vehement and demonstrative of all. He began to curse and swear, “I do not know this man you are talking about!” The verb to curse (from the Greek word anathematizō, from which the English word “anathematize” is derived) indicates that Peter pronounced a curse of divine judgment on his own head if he were lying. The verb to swear (a form of omnuō) refers to a solemn pledge of truthfulness. What began as a knee-jerk reaction to the inquiry of a servant girl had escalated into a premeditated tirade of dogmatic deceit and disloyalty, punctuated with cursing and swearing, that echoed throughout the courtyard.

Just as Jesus had predicted (Mark 14:30), as soon as this third episode ended, immediately a rooster crowed a second time. (Mark is the only gospel writer who notes that the rooster crowed twice, an added detail that in no way contradicts the other gospel accounts.) By this time, Jesus’ trial at Caiaphas’s house had come to its conclusion. The Lord had been falsely accused, convicted of blasphemy, and mocked and beaten by the Sanhedrin and the temple police (14:56–65). At that very moment, He was likely being led back across the courtyard. According to Luke 22:61, just after the rooster crowed, “The Lord turned and looked at Peter.” The penetrating gaze of Christ caught Peter’s eye, pierced his soul, and burned deep into his conscience. Instantly, Peter’s heart and mind flooded with feelings of guilt, remorse, and shame. It was a look he certainly never forgot.

FERVENT CONTRITION

And Peter remembered how Jesus had made the remark to him, “Before a rooster crows twice, you will deny Me three times.” And he began to weep. (14:72b)

Under the gaze of his Lord, Peter felt the full weight of his sin and remembered how Jesus had made the remark to him, “Before a rooster crows twice, you will deny Me three times.” He had done exactly what Jesus said he would do. His arrogant boasts from a few hours earlier (cf. Mark 14:31) had proven hollow. He had been disloyal, disobedient, and dishonest. But although his courage had failed, his faith would not (Luke 22:32). Unlike Judas, who felt remorse and committed suicide (Matt. 27:3–10), Peter felt remorse and repented (cf. 2 Cor. 7:10). Deeply convicted and broken over his actions, he fled the scene (Luke 22:62) and he began to weep bitterly (Matt. 26:75). He sobbed with tears of fervent contrition in the aftermath of severe weakness and failure.

Though Peter sinned greatly, his true character is not seen in his denials but in his repentance, beginning with heartfelt sorrow. He had discovered the corruption of his own flesh even in the face of his best intentions. But Peter’s failures are not the end of his story. Evidence of the genuineness of Peter’s faith can be seen almost immediately. It was Peter and John who raced to the empty tomb (John 20:2–10). Peter was one of the first to see the risen Christ (cf. 1 Cor. 15:5). He was with the disciples when they gathered in the upper room (John 20:19–20). He went to Galilee to wait for the Lord as instructed (Matt. 28:10; cf. John 21:1–11). And it was there, in Galilee, that Peter was fully restored to ministry by the Lord Jesus. As John 21:15–17 recounts,

Peter had repeatedly and adamantly denied the Lord Jesus on three separate occasions. Jesus therefore questioned Peter three times about his love for Him. For each episode of denial, Peter was given an opportunity to affirm his devotion to Christ.

Incredibly, the man who fearfully disavowed the Lord Jesus would become the fervent preacher of the book of Acts—boldly proclaiming the gospel on the day of Pentecost (Acts 2:14–40) less than two months after the devastating collapse of courage recorded in this passage. Jesus had predicted that Peter, after he was restored, would strengthen his fellow believers (cf. Luke 22:32). That promise was fulfilled, not only in Acts (cf. Acts 4:14–31) but also years later when Peter explained to persecuted Christians in Asia Minor that true faith cannot fail, even when severely tested (cf. 1 Peter 1:6–7).

In his failings, Peter learned that pride and overconfidence make believers spiritually vulnerable. But God grants the victory to those who are humble, dependent on Him, and on guard in the face of temptation (cf. 2 Peter 3:17–18). As the forgiven apostle explained in 1 Peter 5:5–8,