Original Meaning
Paul’s Greeting (1:1–2)
HERE IN 2 TIMOTHY, Paul connects his apostleship with the “will of God, according to the promise of life that is in Christ Jesus.” As in Titus, the salutation includes the idea of life, and, like both other Pastoral Letters, it provides a realistic picture of the author, the recipient, and the problems in the congregation. However, there is a marked poignancy in this letter that is absent from the others. Paul refers to his imprisonment and suffering (1:8), reflects on his grief that many have deserted him (v. 15), and later returns to that theme after he expresses what seems to be an anticipation of imminent death (4:6–18). Although in the canon the two letters to Timothy are placed together, followed by Titus, the tone of this letter leads many to place it chronologically after Titus as Paul’s final written words.
On Paul’s apostleship (v. 1), see comments on 1 Timothy 1:1. His reference to the “will of God” stands alone in the Pastoral Letters, though it is not unique among the Pauline letters (see 1 Cor. 1:1; 2 Cor. 1:1; Eph. 1:1; Col. 1:1).
But why does Paul add the words “according to the promise of life that is in Christ Jesus” in 1:1? He referred to eternal life in Titus 1:2, but that has to do with faith and knowledge of the truth, not, as here, directly to Paul’s apostleship. The idea of promise appears elsewhere in Paul’s writings—especially in Galatians, where his argumentation includes reference to the fact that the “promises” were given to Abraham long before the law was introduced (Gal. 3:15–22). The reason for a reference to “the promise of life” here in 2 Timothy is that “Paul’s mission is to make known that this promise receives fulfillment through fellowship with Christ.”1 The phrase also reminds us of 1 Timothy 4:8, where the “promise” relates both to the “present life” and “the life to come.”
The words “according to” in the NIV translate the preposition kata (“for the sake of,” NRSV). Opinions differ as to the significance of the preposition and its phrase. Ellicott says kata denotes “the object and intention of the appointment…‘to further, to make known the promise of eternal life.'”2 Kelly translates it “in reference to.”3 For Lock the phrase “gives the standard by which God chose [Paul] and to which his Apostleship must be true”4 (See my comments on Titus 1:1–4, where kata appears four times. Its first use in Titus, where it may convey the idea of appropriateness, seems close to this passage, and I have suggested that John 2:6 provides another example.) The word kata probably indicates that Paul’s apostleship is not so much to promote the promise (Ellicott) as it is to be in accordance with it (NIV).
The reference to “Christ” in verse 1 is one of thirty-two in the Pastoral Letters, almost always along with “Jesus.” In that combination, 2 Timothy almost always places “Christ” before “Jesus,” and it is usually thought that at this time “Christ” was being used primarily as a title. That order, however, is not uniform (see 1 Tim. 6:3, 14; Titus 1:1; 2:13; 3:6). This does not, of course, require a late date for the Pastoral Letters. The word “Christ” is first of all a title (“Messiah” or “Anointed One”). In Philippians 1 (to take an example of an acknowledged Pauline writing) “Christ” occurs eighteen times, and it appears both alone and with the name Jesus in both orders. The prepositional phrase “in Christ Jesus” may be one of many uses by Paul where it conveys the idea of close relationship or union.
In verse 2 Paul identifies Timothy as his “dear son,” a more natural and personal expression than “my true son in the faith” (1 Tim. 1:2; see also Titus 1:4). Paul repeats “my son” at the beginning of the exhortation in 2 Timothy 2:1. The rest of 1:2 in the salutation is similar to that in 1 Timothy 1:2 and Titus 1:4 (see comments on 1 Tim. 1:2), except that the latter omits the word “mercy.”
Bridging Contexts
THE SENSE OF urgency under the duress of a command and against the forces of evil that characterizes 1 Timothy is past. So is the sense of conflict against lying, deceitful enemies that marks the opening of Titus. In contrast, 2 Timothy opens with the reminder of the “promise of life” in Christ. That does not mean that all opposition is gone. Already in 1:15 Paul reflects on his own unhappy circumstances and feelings of abandonment. The presence of evil and heresy at Ephesus is clearly indicated in the rest of the letter.
Nevertheless, one has the sense in reading this letter of two friends talking. They are on the alert for trouble, but are reflecting mainly on their own lives and on how they are fairing in the conflict. Paul appears more as a mentor than as a commander. In 1 Timothy 1 he marveled at the grace of God in saving him and calling him to ministry. In 2 Timothy we see an additional element: Paul is suffering (1:11–12; 2:8–10; 3:10–13), but is trusting God for the future. Most scholars understand 4:6–8 as expressing his sense of impending execution. Picture Timothy reading this letter privately with deep emotion, possibly sharing some of it with the church (perhaps less of it than of the first letter, though eventually he gave it out for “publication”). We can only imagine his feelings when he read this again after Paul’s death.
The promise of life in Christ. It is not surprising, then, given Paul’s anticipation of his death, that he opens this letter with a reference to “the promise of life that is in Christ Jesus.” This does not mean that we have a different Paul (or a different person). He is still concerned with the importance of keeping “a clear conscience” as he was in 1 Timothy 1:5, 19, but immediately he turns attention to Timothy and his feelings. Within a few lines he has again combined faith with conscience. This time, however, it is the faith of Timothy’s mother and grandmother. To the names Lois and Eunice can be added those of Monica (the mother of St. Augustine), Susanna Wesley (the mother of John and Charles), and generations of Christians who have effectively instructed and prayed for children and grandchildren. The emphasis we sometimes place on 2 Timothy 2:2 about discipling others can be equally placed on this passage on the importance of the Christian nurture of one’s family.
Whatever the statistics may be concerning earlier generations, it seems that now all too often, although many young people from non-Christian families are turning to Christ, many children from Christian families are turning away from him. We are the beneficiaries of much literature on parenting, and yet seem to have great difficulty in passing on our Christian values and faith to our children. To observe this is not to lower guilt on anyone, but to observe the importance of Christian character and instruction in the home. Even at the early stage of Christianity represented in 1 Timothy 1 there were those for whom the way of salvation was paved by the faith of parents and grandparents.
A home where there were at least some earnest Jewish believers was a wonderful place of preparation for personal faith in the Messiah. Someone once coined the expression, “God has no grandchildren.” To the extent that this means that each generation must come to God freshly and that we are not saved by the faith of our parents if they are God’s children, it is true. However, Christian history has shown, and those of us who have been in the Lord’s work over a long lifetime have observed that when people come to Christ, there are often parents, grandparents, or others in their background who have long and earnestly prayed for their salvation.
Those “others” may well be Sunday school teachers. Not long ago a funeral service was held for a man who had many friends and had been a vibrant witness for Christ, but who had never held a major leadership position in the church. The dominant image portrayed of him, however, was of a faithful Sunday school teacher. Many of his former students were there and gave testimony of his faithfulness and total devotion to them—a devotion that extended far beyond Sundays. His model, influence, and prayers will affect their lives for decades.
Timothy’s gift. The reference in verse 6 to fanning God’s gift into flame adds to our understanding of the laying on of hands first mentioned in 1 Timothy 4:14. It is perhaps strange that throughout church history so much emphasis has been put on the laying on of hands as a ritual by which one is installed in an office, when the biblical emphasis is so clearly on the impartation of a spiritual gift. Apart from issues of biblical interpretation and of ecclesiastical practice, it must be said that it is probably easier to subscribe to an act of ordination that declares a change in status than to believe that, when people lay their hands on an individual, God himself is actually, through them, giving that person a new gift or power from the Holy Spirit. Yet that is precisely what both texts teach, and what Paul goes on to discuss in 2 Timothy 1:7.
This is not to deny that God’s gifts may also come to believers at conversion or in subsequent circumstances. Nor does it deny that all believers have spiritual gifts from God. In fact, verse 7 implies that they do, by speaking of the gift that God gave to “us” (unless Paul was restricting that to just Timothy and himself). Nevertheless, in this case Timothy clearly received, through the imposition of Paul’s hands, a gift from God that he either did not have before or did not have in the same manner or to the same extent. In some way the Holy Spirit brought to Timothy’s human spirit new “power…love and…self-discipline” (v. 7). Christians are often in a dilemma over whether to “let go and let God,” that is, to yield to God and passively wait for him to transform them spiritually or to be actively shaping their own Christian character.
The issues are deep and complex—too much for detailed treatment here. But they should not be overlooked, and they are raised at this point by the reference to the endowment given to Timothy at the laying on of hands. Was this a gift of the Holy Spirit himself, who brings with him the power, love, and self-discipline we need, or did the gift consist of qualities and abilities? If the gift is the Spirit, did Timothy not have the Spirit prior to this occasion? Was the gift a fresh anointing of the Spirit; and, if so, is there some Scripture that clearly describes and explains this supplementary endowment of the Spirit? And in either case, was the gift something that Timothy would not otherwise have possessed?
That may have been the case with “power,” but was it the case with “love”? The power to exorcise demons is probably not in view; rather, it is probably the power to bring people from darkness to light (Acts 26:17–18). This is not something we can do. But is not love something for which we are responsible ourselves—both as an act of obedience to the two great commandments and as an expression of mature Christian character? And what about “self-discipline”? Is that something we wait to receive from God or is it our responsibility to achieve? The fact that Timothy was to stir this gift into flame implies that he himself bore responsibility for its nurturing.
The answer to such questions must at least include several considerations. Power, love, and self-discipline are not commodities; they are attitudes and actions. As such they are not static gifts wrapped in a package that we can possess. They must be exercised by the individual. But to the extent that the motivation and the will to exercise them are weak or lacking, these must come from God.
Ever since the famous incident in which it was realized that an increase in the effectiveness of work by factory employees was caused not by a quantitative change in the level of lighting but by the realization of the workers that someone was concerned enough for them to experiment with the lighting, motivational studies have been carried on intensively. Our performance in any activity depends largely on what motivates us. This, of course, involves not only external prompting, but our inner disposition and sense of values. Fear can be a powerful motivator both positively and negatively. As noted above, Timothy’s problem may not have been fear, timidity, or cowardice, but all three can affect us deeply. In certain situations fear can either cause us to depress the brake or kick the accelerator. Cowardice only operates the brake. The trio of power, love, and self-discipline forms an impressive and effective counterforce to timidity.
Contemporary Significance
TODAY’S TIMOTHYS. Mission leaders today are meeting a different kind of volunteer than they were accustomed to a couple of generations ago. The same is true of admissions counselors at seminaries and often of pastoral search committees in churches. An extraordinary number of applicants grew up in non-Christian families and many (whether the families were Christian or not) suffered through the divorce of parents and/or were abused. The “old days” when a pastoral candidate had grown up with a knowledge of Christian doctrine, had studied Greek, Latin, and perhaps ancient history in college to prepare for seminary, and then took a seminary course in the classical tradition have long since disappeared. Today’s mission boards and executives need to be sensitive to individual life histories and the emotional health of their candidates and missionaries on the field. It is a tribute to the grace of God and the self-discipline of such candidates that they have been able to overcome the effect of years of drugs and free love in America to enter the service of God.
The skills and professional knowledge needed for service to God today can be gained in many ways. What is less attainable are character and wisdom. These are qualities that are sometimes lacking in professional religious figures. The seminary, church, mission, or other parachurch organization can help candidates for service by concentrating as much as possible on their personal and spiritual well-being. Psychological testing and appropriate counseling should not be viewed negatively but with appreciation. Today’s Lois and Eunice may be an InterVarsity staff member and a seminary teacher, and today’s Paul may be a mission executive.
It is never too late to foster the development of character or wisdom in the Lord’s servant, but we do not want to forfeit the opportunities of early nurturing. It is still the sober task of parents and grandparents to monitor their own lives and parental care so as to give their children a healthy upbringing. Grandparents, who used to pray for their grandchildren with happy optimism, now need to be proactive in their prayers, anticipating the weaknesses of even the finest Christian homes as well as the forces against their grandchildren’s spiritual development in the neighborhood, school, and workplace.
Also gone, for the most part, are the days when a young person who is faithful in Sunday school and who perhaps assists in various ministries will be noticed in the church, taken under the care of the pastor or others, and shepherded into Christian ministry. Today pastors, elders, Sunday school teachers, youth leaders, and others need to be praying for young men and women to respond to God’s call to Christian life and service. Here also we need to be proactive, prayerfully searching for those who may be suitable for special ministries and encouraging them personally. A large number of those who go on to such ministries and missionary work have left home for education or other purposes, many being converted while at college and university, and are now asking churches that barely know them to support them financially in ministry.
What young Timothys today need especially is personal mentoring, but not merely mentoring in the sense of giving information and offering guidance. Too often that becomes a means of control and the reproduction of ourselves in the other, accompanied by all our agendas and opinions. We may think we have discipled or mentored a person when they adopt our outlook on things, pray as we do, witness as we do and, if it is a pastoral relationship, preach as we do. The word “clone” comes to mind.
In the ancient Life of Apollonius of Tyana, a pagan figure apparently shaped in the literature to make him seem like a superior competitor to the Christians’ Jesus, there is a curious scene about him climbing into a boat. His disciples artificially imitate his every move as they follow him into it. That is not what Christian discipling and mentoring are about. To mentor a Timothy means to be available, to spend time with him or her, to understand the differences, and to seek to facilitate rather than to control the use of that person’s distinctive gifts. An athlete runs the race alone but does so after months or perhaps years of training and encouragement. And that may not be done just by a coach, but by others who are close to the athlete. In Paul Timothy had a person who was close to him, who listened and understood him, who recognized his individual giftedness, and who had confidence in him.
The role of the church. A picture is developing in these letters of a servant of God who functions independently of, but in close fellowship with, the church. Timothy was nurtured by a believing mother and grandmother. He was well thought of in the church (Acts 16:2). He assisted Paul in carrying out the decisions of the church at Jerusalem (16:4). He received the laying on of hands by the church elders (1 Tim. 4:14). Today, when many people are coming to Christ apart from the church, it seems in accordance with this picture for them to be encouraged into church fellowship and to function in cooperation with the church leadership. While on occasion great missionaries and others have had to act independently because church leaders have lacked vision, the healthy church will encourage and facilitate the ministry of those who seek to serve the Lord.
This picture includes Timothy’s assumption—and our assumption—of responsibility for character development. God’s gifts are not a substitute for personal character; they assist in its development. While it is true that a missionary acts in love to help a repulsive victim of a wasting disease because God has given the gift of love by his Spirit, it is also true that the missionary makes a conscious decision to respond to that love, to grow in it personally, and to put it into action where it is deeply needed. Just as Timothy could resist a paralyzing sense of shame when he witnessed (as well as avoiding an embarrassing sense of shame over the imprisonment of his “supervisor” Paul) because of the gifts God had given him (see comments on 1:8), so we also can experience the effect of these gifts in our lives.
There is, in short, a mutuality in which God’s supernatural gifts and our response in obedience and character development work together. The gifts alone may result in visible accomplishments, but unless those gifts are allowed to work inwardly as well as outwardly, the spiritual and character development they should produce will not take place. They will be like faith without works and like the gifts of 1 Corinthians 12 without the love of 1 Corinthians 13. In short, churches, like parents and grandparents, must be much more alert to find and encourage Timothys and provide them with the prayer, spiritual resources, and support they need to serve God.
Even if we do all this, however, it is still the Spirit of God who gives the necessary endowment for Christian ministry. It was that way in generations past when sometimes rough, ill-educated individuals, who were looked on with dismay rather than expectation by church leaders, went out in the power of God alone, and saw him work in wonderful ways. It is true now, when many of those in significant movements of our time, like YWAM and Promise Keepers, have little formal training in theology. It is perhaps ironic, but also significant, that while many pastors who have labored through biblical studies and theology in seminary deliver simplified sermons to attract and win seekers, laypeople with little, if any, biblical or theological education are teaching Sunday school classes, small home groups, and community-wide Bible studies to people hungry for deeper teaching. These teachers and learners are some of today’s Timothys, motivated by the Spirit of God and needing all the encouragement and training they can get.
Another way to encourage Timothys in our times is to give support and personal encouragement to minority students and those from emerging countries. Seminaries need scholarship funds. Also there are organizations, like the Christian International Scholarship Foundation, who help support promising Christian workers from emerging countries. They select those who are already proven leaders but who need advanced studies to serve the Lord even more effectively in their home countries. Likewise, Bible schools and seminaries overseas need help from their North American brothers and sisters.
The necessity of prayer. The most important factor of all in the life of Timothy may be discerned in these few words in verse 3: “Night and day I constantly remember you in my prayers.” Timothy needed the ongoing specific faithful prayers of his mentor. The writer of this commentary, like many other Christians in our day, not only has benefited from the prayers of others but has the privilege and responsibility of receiving prayer requests almost daily from missionaries and others in the Lord’s work. E-mail makes it possible to know and bring needs immediately before God.
But it is not necessary to know the immediate circumstances of the Lord’s servants in order to pray faithfully for them “night and day.” The prayers of Paul, the faith of Timothy’s mother and grandmother, the confidence of those who laid hands on him, and the gift of God given to him all lead to the conclusion that begins the next section, “So do not be ashamed to testify about our Lord, or ashamed of me his prisoner” (1:8).
1. Kelly, Pastoral Epistles, 153.
2. Ellicott, Commentary on the Epistles of Saint Paul, 121.
3. Kelly, Pastoral Epistles, 153.
4. Lock, Pastoral Epistles, 82; Knight adopts Ellicott’s view (Pastoral Epistles, 364).
5. The Greek word does not exclude women, although in Greek literature gyne could be added to specify a female ancestor.
6. F. F. Bruce, The Acts of the Apostles: Greek Text With Introduction and Commentary, 3d rev. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1990), 352.
7. Most commentators have understood this reference to timidity (or “cowardice,” deilia) to describe Timothy. They may support this by referring to 1 Cor. 16:10, where Paul tells the Corinthians, “See to it that he has nothing to fear while he is with you.” C. R. Hutson contests this rendering (“Was Timothy Timid? On the Rhetoric of Fearlessness [1 Corinthians 16:10–11] and Cowardice [2 Timothy 1:7]” in Journal of the Chicago Society of Biblical Research 42 [1997]: 58–73). He proposes for the Corinthian passage: “If Timothy comes, recognize that he is fearless toward you.” He holds the reference to timidity in the present passage to be comparable to the rhetoric of philosophers to their students, intended to appeal to their sense of shame so that they would not be timid. There is nothing in Acts or in any of Paul’s other letters to suggest that Timothy was timid. On the contrary, he was a strong associate of Paul’s, who should not be disdained for any reason but accepted as his envoy. It was not a “quavering tenderfoot” that Paul sent “to deal with the fractious Corinthians” (ibid., 62). That may be true, but Timothy still may have had a natural timidity that surfaced in the more hostile environment in Ephesus.
Original Meaning
Remembering Timothy’s Faith and Spiritual Giftedness (1:3–7)
UNLIKE 1 TIMOTHY 1:3–7 and Titus 1:5–9, the references in this passage to the recipient of the letter do not take the form of a commission. They are more reflective, beginning with thanksgiving to God for reminiscences about Timothy. The content of this section is closer to typical elements in Greco-Roman letters than is the case in 1 Timothy or Titus. It was customary to offer kind, sometimes flattering, comments about the recipient. Paul is tender and sincere in his thoughts. But he also slips in some remarks about his own service to God before he continues with his comments about Timothy.
The word “serve” translates latreuo, which often refers to worship, especially with regard to the offering of worship in a cultic context. In the lxx this, of course, was the divine worship offered to God in his temple. To translate it “serve” loses the sense of the worship context, but to translate it “worship” would fall short of indicating that the form it took in Paul’s ministry was active service. The reference to his “forefathers”5 recalls his Jewish heritage (Phil. 3:4–5) in a positive way. Paul’s “clear conscience” recalls his insistence on this qualification for deacons in 1 Timothy 3:9 (see also 1:5, 19). Although in Philippians 3 Paul rejected any works-oriented righteousness as a means of salvation, here he has a clear conscience about the sincere service he has offered God in company with faithful Jewish ancestors.
What follows is a pattern of words about remembrance. (1) Paul remembers Timothy in his prayers. Two expressions describe his perseverance in prayer for Timothy. (a) He does so “constantly.” Paul uses words in this word group elsewhere also to describe that which is incessant (prayers in Rom. 1:9; 1 Thess. 1:2; 2:13; 5:17; anguish over his unbelieving “brothers” in Rom. 9:2–3). (b) He prays “night and day.” It does not mean that Timothy is never out of his thoughts, but that during his frequent prayers around the clock he never fails to mention the young pastor. Paul’s constant prayers for the Thessalonian believers, along with his reference to working “night and day” so that he would not burden them, are worth consulting (1 Thess. 1:2, 3; 2:9, 13; 3:10; 5:17; cf. also 1 Tim. 5:5, about the widow who “continues night and day to pray”).
(2) Next, Paul remembers Timothy’s tears (v. 4). We do not know the occasion referred to. It may have been when Paul left Ephesus (1 Tim. 1:3), since we do not know of any further meeting between the two. The important thing is what it says about their relationship. Clearly Timothy is not the only one who is sad, for Paul longs to see Timothy so that he himself may be “filled with joy.”
(3) Paul then recalls Timothy’s “sincere faith” (v. 5). Comparing this passage with Acts 16:1–3, we gather that the opinions of his acquaintances differed as to the kind of home in which Timothy grew up. It is clear that his mother was Jewish, which meant that Timothy was Jewish also. But her marriage to a Gentile meant a break in her relationship to her religion. Thus, on the one hand Timothy was “technically an apostate Jew because he was uncircumcised,” and on the other hand was viewed by Gentiles as virtually Jewish.6 In order to clarify his status and to protect his own acceptance in the synagogue, Paul had Timothy circumcised. Yet it was already clear to Paul when he met him that Timothy had an authentic Jewish faith, thanks to the piety of his mother Eunice and his grandmother Lois.
(4) The fourth remembrance is actually a reminder Paul gives Timothy to fan God’s gift into flame (v. 6). This may presuppose a lessening of Timothy’s effectiveness. We do not know the length of time between the two letters to Timothy, nor do we know the effect that the confrontation with the false teachers at Ephesus may have had on him. Paul’s words do not necessarily mean that Timothy’s passion had abated, though the verb translated “fan into flame” can have the sense of rekindling a dying fire. The basis of Paul’s exhortation (“for this reason”) is Timothy’s faith (v. 5), so we know that there is no lapse there.
In understanding verse 7 it is common to do “mirror reading,” that is, to assume that the mention “of power, of love and of self-discipline” implies that Timothy lacks these and that, because “timidity” is mentioned, this is his problem. It seems reasonable to assume that the inner abilities that God gave Timothy for ministry—power, love, and self-discipline—were being weakened as a natural timidity began to take over. On this reading, in order to overcome a natural reticence to speak and act with confidence, Timothy needs to allow the spiritual gift to resume its dominance and restore a higher level of effectiveness in his ministry. This reconstruction takes into account all of the elements of verses 6–7.7
It remains to observe the wording with respect to the bestowal of that “gift [charisma] of God,” which was “through [dia] the laying on of [Paul’s] hands.” This may imply that Paul was one of the elders who laid hands on him (1 Tim. 4:14). There is a difference between this wording and that of 1 Timothy 4:14, where the bestowal of the gift was “through [dia]” prophecy, “with [meta]” the laying on of hands by the group of elders. It may be that Paul now wants to emphasize that his (and the elders') role was not only to accompany the bestowal of the gift but to be involved in it as well.
The use of the word anazopyreo, “fan into flame,” raises a theological issue: Can an inward spiritual gift of God die down like a fire and be rekindled by an act of the will? Does one have control over that which is the sovereign work of the Holy Spirit of God? A true understanding of this verse must be consistent with the proper answer to those questions. The fact that in 1 Corinthians 14:22–40 Paul teaches the regulation of spiritual gifts shows that Christians have responsibility for their use. The very word translated “self-discipline” means taking responsibility to be moderate or to act reasonably. It implies that the individual exercises control. For the Christian, the motivation and power to do this comes from the Holy Spirit, but we must respond by making the right decisions and taking the right actions.
The “spirit” mentioned in verse 7 is probably the Holy Spirit himself, not the human spirit. It is something God gave and was probably part of the gift mentioned in verse 6. The gift seems to have been a measure or kind of power, love, and ability to control oneself that is beyond our normal capacities, which comes only from the Holy Spirit. He is not the kind of Spirit who brings fear.
Bridging Contexts
THE SENSE OF urgency under the duress of a command and against the forces of evil that characterizes 1 Timothy is past. So is the sense of conflict against lying, deceitful enemies that marks the opening of Titus. In contrast, 2 Timothy opens with the reminder of the “promise of life” in Christ. That does not mean that all opposition is gone. Already in 1:15 Paul reflects on his own unhappy circumstances and feelings of abandonment. The presence of evil and heresy at Ephesus is clearly indicated in the rest of the letter.
Nevertheless, one has the sense in reading this letter of two friends talking. They are on the alert for trouble, but are reflecting mainly on their own lives and on how they are fairing in the conflict. Paul appears more as a mentor than as a commander. In 1 Timothy 1 he marveled at the grace of God in saving him and calling him to ministry. In 2 Timothy we see an additional element: Paul is suffering (1:11–12; 2:8–10; 3:10–13), but is trusting God for the future. Most scholars understand 4:6–8 as expressing his sense of impending execution. Picture Timothy reading this letter privately with deep emotion, possibly sharing some of it with the church (perhaps less of it than of the first letter, though eventually he gave it out for “publication”). We can only imagine his feelings when he read this again after Paul’s death.
The promise of life in Christ. It is not surprising, then, given Paul’s anticipation of his death, that he opens this letter with a reference to “the promise of life that is in Christ Jesus.” This does not mean that we have a different Paul (or a different person). He is still concerned with the importance of keeping “a clear conscience” as he was in 1 Timothy 1:5, 19, but immediately he turns attention to Timothy and his feelings. Within a few lines he has again combined faith with conscience. This time, however, it is the faith of Timothy’s mother and grandmother. To the names Lois and Eunice can be added those of Monica (the mother of St. Augustine), Susanna Wesley (the mother of John and Charles), and generations of Christians who have effectively instructed and prayed for children and grandchildren. The emphasis we sometimes place on 2 Timothy 2:2 about discipling others can be equally placed on this passage on the importance of the Christian nurture of one’s family.
Whatever the statistics may be concerning earlier generations, it seems that now all too often, although many young people from non-Christian families are turning to Christ, many children from Christian families are turning away from him. We are the beneficiaries of much literature on parenting, and yet seem to have great difficulty in passing on our Christian values and faith to our children. To observe this is not to lower guilt on anyone, but to observe the importance of Christian character and instruction in the home. Even at the early stage of Christianity represented in 1 Timothy 1 there were those for whom the way of salvation was paved by the faith of parents and grandparents.
A home where there were at least some earnest Jewish believers was a wonderful place of preparation for personal faith in the Messiah. Someone once coined the expression, “God has no grandchildren.” To the extent that this means that each generation must come to God freshly and that we are not saved by the faith of our parents if they are God’s children, it is true. However, Christian history has shown, and those of us who have been in the Lord’s work over a long lifetime have observed that when people come to Christ, there are often parents, grandparents, or others in their background who have long and earnestly prayed for their salvation.
Those “others” may well be Sunday school teachers. Not long ago a funeral service was held for a man who had many friends and had been a vibrant witness for Christ, but who had never held a major leadership position in the church. The dominant image portrayed of him, however, was of a faithful Sunday school teacher. Many of his former students were there and gave testimony of his faithfulness and total devotion to them—a devotion that extended far beyond Sundays. His model, influence, and prayers will affect their lives for decades.
Timothy’s gift. The reference in verse 6 to fanning God’s gift into flame adds to our understanding of the laying on of hands first mentioned in 1 Timothy 4:14. It is perhaps strange that throughout church history so much emphasis has been put on the laying on of hands as a ritual by which one is installed in an office, when the biblical emphasis is so clearly on the impartation of a spiritual gift. Apart from issues of biblical interpretation and of ecclesiastical practice, it must be said that it is probably easier to subscribe to an act of ordination that declares a change in status than to believe that, when people lay their hands on an individual, God himself is actually, through them, giving that person a new gift or power from the Holy Spirit. Yet that is precisely what both texts teach, and what Paul goes on to discuss in 2 Timothy 1:7.
This is not to deny that God’s gifts may also come to believers at conversion or in subsequent circumstances. Nor does it deny that all believers have spiritual gifts from God. In fact, verse 7 implies that they do, by speaking of the gift that God gave to “us” (unless Paul was restricting that to just Timothy and himself). Nevertheless, in this case Timothy clearly received, through the imposition of Paul’s hands, a gift from God that he either did not have before or did not have in the same manner or to the same extent. In some way the Holy Spirit brought to Timothy’s human spirit new “power…love and…self-discipline” (v. 7). Christians are often in a dilemma over whether to “let go and let God,” that is, to yield to God and passively wait for him to transform them spiritually or to be actively shaping their own Christian character.
The issues are deep and complex—too much for detailed treatment here. But they should not be overlooked, and they are raised at this point by the reference to the endowment given to Timothy at the laying on of hands. Was this a gift of the Holy Spirit himself, who brings with him the power, love, and self-discipline we need, or did the gift consist of qualities and abilities? If the gift is the Spirit, did Timothy not have the Spirit prior to this occasion? Was the gift a fresh anointing of the Spirit; and, if so, is there some Scripture that clearly describes and explains this supplementary endowment of the Spirit? And in either case, was the gift something that Timothy would not otherwise have possessed?
That may have been the case with “power,” but was it the case with “love”? The power to exorcise demons is probably not in view; rather, it is probably the power to bring people from darkness to light (Acts 26:17–18). This is not something we can do. But is not love something for which we are responsible ourselves—both as an act of obedience to the two great commandments and as an expression of mature Christian character? And what about “self-discipline”? Is that something we wait to receive from God or is it our responsibility to achieve? The fact that Timothy was to stir this gift into flame implies that he himself bore responsibility for its nurturing.
The answer to such questions must at least include several considerations. Power, love, and self-discipline are not commodities; they are attitudes and actions. As such they are not static gifts wrapped in a package that we can possess. They must be exercised by the individual. But to the extent that the motivation and the will to exercise them are weak or lacking, these must come from God.
Ever since the famous incident in which it was realized that an increase in the effectiveness of work by factory employees was caused not by a quantitative change in the level of lighting but by the realization of the workers that someone was concerned enough for them to experiment with the lighting, motivational studies have been carried on intensively. Our performance in any activity depends largely on what motivates us. This, of course, involves not only external prompting, but our inner disposition and sense of values. Fear can be a powerful motivator both positively and negatively. As noted above, Timothy’s problem may not have been fear, timidity, or cowardice, but all three can affect us deeply. In certain situations fear can either cause us to depress the brake or kick the accelerator. Cowardice only operates the brake. The trio of power, love, and self-discipline forms an impressive and effective counterforce to timidity.
Contemporary Significance
TODAY’S TIMOTHYS. Mission leaders today are meeting a different kind of volunteer than they were accustomed to a couple of generations ago. The same is true of admissions counselors at seminaries and often of pastoral search committees in churches. An extraordinary number of applicants grew up in non-Christian families and many (whether the families were Christian or not) suffered through the divorce of parents and/or were abused. The “old days” when a pastoral candidate had grown up with a knowledge of Christian doctrine, had studied Greek, Latin, and perhaps ancient history in college to prepare for seminary, and then took a seminary course in the classical tradition have long since disappeared. Today’s mission boards and executives need to be sensitive to individual life histories and the emotional health of their candidates and missionaries on the field. It is a tribute to the grace of God and the self-discipline of such candidates that they have been able to overcome the effect of years of drugs and free love in America to enter the service of God.
The skills and professional knowledge needed for service to God today can be gained in many ways. What is less attainable are character and wisdom. These are qualities that are sometimes lacking in professional religious figures. The seminary, church, mission, or other parachurch organization can help candidates for service by concentrating as much as possible on their personal and spiritual well-being. Psychological testing and appropriate counseling should not be viewed negatively but with appreciation. Today’s Lois and Eunice may be an InterVarsity staff member and a seminary teacher, and today’s Paul may be a mission executive.
It is never too late to foster the development of character or wisdom in the Lord’s servant, but we do not want to forfeit the opportunities of early nurturing. It is still the sober task of parents and grandparents to monitor their own lives and parental care so as to give their children a healthy upbringing. Grandparents, who used to pray for their grandchildren with happy optimism, now need to be proactive in their prayers, anticipating the weaknesses of even the finest Christian homes as well as the forces against their grandchildren’s spiritual development in the neighborhood, school, and workplace.
Also gone, for the most part, are the days when a young person who is faithful in Sunday school and who perhaps assists in various ministries will be noticed in the church, taken under the care of the pastor or others, and shepherded into Christian ministry. Today pastors, elders, Sunday school teachers, youth leaders, and others need to be praying for young men and women to respond to God’s call to Christian life and service. Here also we need to be proactive, prayerfully searching for those who may be suitable for special ministries and encouraging them personally. A large number of those who go on to such ministries and missionary work have left home for education or other purposes, many being converted while at college and university, and are now asking churches that barely know them to support them financially in ministry.
What young Timothys today need especially is personal mentoring, but not merely mentoring in the sense of giving information and offering guidance. Too often that becomes a means of control and the reproduction of ourselves in the other, accompanied by all our agendas and opinions. We may think we have discipled or mentored a person when they adopt our outlook on things, pray as we do, witness as we do and, if it is a pastoral relationship, preach as we do. The word “clone” comes to mind.
In the ancient Life of Apollonius of Tyana, a pagan figure apparently shaped in the literature to make him seem like a superior competitor to the Christians’ Jesus, there is a curious scene about him climbing into a boat. His disciples artificially imitate his every move as they follow him into it. That is not what Christian discipling and mentoring are about. To mentor a Timothy means to be available, to spend time with him or her, to understand the differences, and to seek to facilitate rather than to control the use of that person’s distinctive gifts. An athlete runs the race alone but does so after months or perhaps years of training and encouragement. And that may not be done just by a coach, but by others who are close to the athlete. In Paul Timothy had a person who was close to him, who listened and understood him, who recognized his individual giftedness, and who had confidence in him.
The role of the church. A picture is developing in these letters of a servant of God who functions independently of, but in close fellowship with, the church. Timothy was nurtured by a believing mother and grandmother. He was well thought of in the church (Acts 16:2). He assisted Paul in carrying out the decisions of the church at Jerusalem (16:4). He received the laying on of hands by the church elders (1 Tim. 4:14). Today, when many people are coming to Christ apart from the church, it seems in accordance with this picture for them to be encouraged into church fellowship and to function in cooperation with the church leadership. While on occasion great missionaries and others have had to act independently because church leaders have lacked vision, the healthy church will encourage and facilitate the ministry of those who seek to serve the Lord.
This picture includes Timothy’s assumption—and our assumption—of responsibility for character development. God’s gifts are not a substitute for personal character; they assist in its development. While it is true that a missionary acts in love to help a repulsive victim of a wasting disease because God has given the gift of love by his Spirit, it is also true that the missionary makes a conscious decision to respond to that love, to grow in it personally, and to put it into action where it is deeply needed. Just as Timothy could resist a paralyzing sense of shame when he witnessed (as well as avoiding an embarrassing sense of shame over the imprisonment of his “supervisor” Paul) because of the gifts God had given him (see comments on 1:8), so we also can experience the effect of these gifts in our lives.
There is, in short, a mutuality in which God’s supernatural gifts and our response in obedience and character development work together. The gifts alone may result in visible accomplishments, but unless those gifts are allowed to work inwardly as well as outwardly, the spiritual and character development they should produce will not take place. They will be like faith without works and like the gifts of 1 Corinthians 12 without the love of 1 Corinthians 13. In short, churches, like parents and grandparents, must be much more alert to find and encourage Timothys and provide them with the prayer, spiritual resources, and support they need to serve God.
Even if we do all this, however, it is still the Spirit of God who gives the necessary endowment for Christian ministry. It was that way in generations past when sometimes rough, ill-educated individuals, who were looked on with dismay rather than expectation by church leaders, went out in the power of God alone, and saw him work in wonderful ways. It is true now, when many of those in significant movements of our time, like YWAM and Promise Keepers, have little formal training in theology. It is perhaps ironic, but also significant, that while many pastors who have labored through biblical studies and theology in seminary deliver simplified sermons to attract and win seekers, laypeople with little, if any, biblical or theological education are teaching Sunday school classes, small home groups, and community-wide Bible studies to people hungry for deeper teaching. These teachers and learners are some of today’s Timothys, motivated by the Spirit of God and needing all the encouragement and training they can get.
Another way to encourage Timothys in our times is to give support and personal encouragement to minority students and those from emerging countries. Seminaries need scholarship funds. Also there are organizations, like the Christian International Scholarship Foundation, who help support promising Christian workers from emerging countries. They select those who are already proven leaders but who need advanced studies to serve the Lord even more effectively in their home countries. Likewise, Bible schools and seminaries overseas need help from their North American brothers and sisters.
The necessity of prayer. The most important factor of all in the life of Timothy may be discerned in these few words in verse 3: “Night and day I constantly remember you in my prayers.” Timothy needed the ongoing specific faithful prayers of his mentor. The writer of this commentary, like many other Christians in our day, not only has benefited from the prayers of others but has the privilege and responsibility of receiving prayer requests almost daily from missionaries and others in the Lord’s work. E-mail makes it possible to know and bring needs immediately before God.
But it is not necessary to know the immediate circumstances of the Lord’s servants in order to pray faithfully for them “night and day.” The prayers of Paul, the faith of Timothy’s mother and grandmother, the confidence of those who laid hands on him, and the gift of God given to him all lead to the conclusion that begins the next section, “So do not be ashamed to testify about our Lord, or ashamed of me his prisoner” (1:8).
1. Kelly, Pastoral Epistles, 153.
2. Ellicott, Commentary on the Epistles of Saint Paul, 121.
3. Kelly, Pastoral Epistles, 153.
4. Lock, Pastoral Epistles, 82; Knight adopts Ellicott’s view (Pastoral Epistles, 364).
5. The Greek word does not exclude women, although in Greek literature gyne could be added to specify a female ancestor.
6. F. F. Bruce, The Acts of the Apostles: Greek Text With Introduction and Commentary, 3d rev. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1990), 352.
7. Most commentators have understood this reference to timidity (or “cowardice,” deilia) to describe Timothy. They may support this by referring to 1 Cor. 16:10, where Paul tells the Corinthians, “See to it that he has nothing to fear while he is with you.” C. R. Hutson contests this rendering (“Was Timothy Timid? On the Rhetoric of Fearlessness [1 Corinthians 16:10–11] and Cowardice [2 Timothy 1:7]” in Journal of the Chicago Society of Biblical Research 42 [1997]: 58–73). He proposes for the Corinthian passage: “If Timothy comes, recognize that he is fearless toward you.” He holds the reference to timidity in the present passage to be comparable to the rhetoric of philosophers to their students, intended to appeal to their sense of shame so that they would not be timid. There is nothing in Acts or in any of Paul’s other letters to suggest that Timothy was timid. On the contrary, he was a strong associate of Paul’s, who should not be disdained for any reason but accepted as his envoy. It was not a “quavering tenderfoot” that Paul sent “to deal with the fractious Corinthians” (ibid., 62). That may be true, but Timothy still may have had a natural timidity that surfaced in the more hostile environment in Ephesus.